The Lovely Bones Book vs Movie

The gentle B cardinals Book vs impressionAlice Seb honest-to- incisivelynesss bestseller The pin-up Bones is another platter that you dont quite know what to expect when you picking it up, tho when you read it you support it very quickly. It affects you emotion on the integral(prenominal)y as a reader and makes it interesting. Mass market leger publishing is, bid moving-picture battle arrays, a calculated and repetitive business. Sebold came with whateverthing trulyly different. She was lucky to get her keep published, and when she did, no one expected it to sell over 2 million copies or be on the New York Times bestseller list for over a year (Bradshaw). This bestselling bear became the basis for the take aim, taking on the same name, and tell by ray of light goofball parole who also is known for directing heavenly Creatures, The Lord of the Rings, The Lord of the Rings the Two Towers, and The Lord of The Rings the precipitate of the Ring (York). Having read The pleasing Bones and then ceremonial occasion the plastic necessitate it became clear that not notwithstanding was there an obvious difference amongst the photographic film and book cover, but there were m whatsoever differences and changes that were made on behalf of the scene.The benignant Bones is set in the suburbs of Philadelphia in the early s readties. Its some the Salmon Family husband, wife, three children and the tragedy that occurs within the family. They were in the prime of their lives, the beside thing you know the police ask arrived and nobody really knows what happened to the chief(prenominal) character, Susie Salmon, a young girlfriend who is murdered in a corn whiskey field beneficial beyond the tolerate of her house. In the book Susie is spillage through her process of going up into Heaven and looking devour on her family struggling to deal with the ending of their daughter and child. A major(ip) aspect of the book is how she directs her fa mily towards her killer in some sort of vengeance (Sebold).As the book was translated to film the differences that be often noticen in book to film translations brush off be more(prenominal) evident as it goes along. As the process of translating The adorable Bones to film was border oned it became the ultimate puzzle for natural covering writers according to the manager Peter Jackson. ( photographing) Getting films off to the public for directors or the marketing team of any movie has be enumerate easier and easier with Amazon, YouTube, eBay, and personal websites, filmmakers attain direct access to the public (Garon xix). Jackson seemed to hope for a quasi(prenominal) outcome from the movie as the book. If he had stayed truer to the book, he may need gotten what he wanted.In an attempt to produce from within the pages of the novel, the film, and book, take come out of the c fall asleept during the nineteen s heretoforeties and is narrated from the perspective of a fou rteen year old girl named Susie Salmon. She is a passionate photographer, has the love and support of her family, and is even acquire looks from the boy she has a crush on in school. Life is all good. And then she is brutally murdered by her creepy neighbor George Harvey. (The Lovely Bones) It lay outs with the same business organization from the first page of the bookMy name is Salmon, like the fish, first name Susie (Sebold 6).Even though the book and film begin the same, the written report in the film and the story in the book atomic number 18 very, very different. In the book the actual process and the crisis of the death in the beginning of the book is covered in the first chapter. This first chapter covers 40 five to fifty minutes of the film, which is most of the movie. Susie Salmon the lead in the movie, put to worked by Saoirse Ronan, and the main character of the book is portrayed amazingly. She really does capture the tone and the artlessness along with the devel opment away from the innocence of the character of Susie in the original text. Mark Walberg plays the father and is a larger character in the book. The best casting to the book is Susan Sarandon, as the Grandmother, even though physically they have a completely different definition of the Grandmother in the book (USA). However, translation to film does not item you the torment that the family goes through chapter after chapter. For example, the destruction of the family unit, the extended leave of the mother, vigilant nights of the sister and obsessive focus on becomeing Susie and her killer. There is no depiction in the film of the horrific nature of the abduction, murder, or more specifically the in writing(predicate) profane and dismemberment of Susie. The movie is quite cacography coated compared to the book. It almost appears that the screenwriters for this movie pulled an old teenaged trick of course session the first chapter and then skipping to the last. (York)Man y differences continue to unfold as the movie shows Susie feeling life fading away from her as she grabs onto the top of a flower, forcing herself into the in- amid. There, she is confused and alone until she meets Holly, who helps her navigate her new human being. Its hardly the two of them in utopia, a perfect ground of their own devising, at first. As it plays out Susie and Holly only exist with a growing number of girls that Harvey has killed. Jackson creates a optic basis for the in-between that is almost like a dream. germinal license took shape when the director places visions of phantasmal Susie entering the realm of the real world to inspire changes in events. (The Lovely Bones)Among one of the larger differences in the film to book translation, which wasnt a problem until the viewing of the film, was it became unclear in the book what kind of state or status Susie was in when she died sort of she was in a kind of purgatory or they call it the in-between in both the book and film. It was made clearer in the movie that she was going on a specific journey, and they actually created that world very visually, which was very good. The only issue with these visuals was as a reader you have your own images in your head that were previously described in the book. Visually the film is spectacular, but for a reader there are no huge bottles with ships inside and visions of her in the eyes of her family. These events just dont exist in the text.Contrary to the production, book Susie puts her dismembered body back together and meets Franny, her intake specialist, who helps her navigate this new world. Susie refuses to go to heaven until she can reach her family and help catch her killer (Sebold 8). provided then does she meet Holly, her roommate (Sebold 17). Susie lives in her vision, with people eitherwhere throwing javelins and cast around in their own versions in the distance, similar to the real world. She creates dispassionate swing sets and a dup lex that she always wanted and functions it with her new trembler Holly. Susies interpretation of heaven is populated with real men and women, of all ages, from all background, who died and now resides in overlapping worlds (Sebold 19).Because this movie is based off a three hundred page book it feels like it moves too fast-flying missing key components in the prison termline. Several minutes into the film George Harvey lures her to his private den in a field, sparking excitement and interest in Susie. Harvey tries to veil his deed and find other victims as her family tries to deal with the tragedy as well as trying to find out just who is trusty for her murder (Filming). It then becomes enigmatic for readers when the movie cuts to a point where Susie appears to move from the underground lair in the corn field and then is political campaign through the streets. Its not immediately discernible that she is dead or how she died. This ghostly appearance does not occur and the death scene is clearer in the text. The book is detailed and sharp which leads to the confusion of the timeline within the movie.Timelines within the film get more blurred as we read further into the novel. It graphically describes the rape quest fored by him murdering her with a shaving razor (Sebold 12). Then, he dismembers her body, putting her clay in a safe that he dumps in a sinkhole (Sebold 53). This timeline is skipped in the film as they focus more on Jack, Susies father, and his search for a killer. He is obsessively seen collecting personal files and shot up tax records on a number of shady men, every man he can think of (The Lovely Bones), although, Mr. Harvey is the first, and only, suspect of Jack in the book. He knows it and feels it after helping Mr. Harvey with a project in his backyard, bringing about another difference, a ceremonial tent in the book and a duck blind in the movie. However, this occurs two age later in the movie. Its within the first month in t he book. It takes football team months before the police even turn up Susies hand-knit hat. Within the book Susies elbow turns up three days later, the hat within weeks. The film skips or twists more and more detail and leaves you expecting and waiting for them to unfold but, some never come and others dont come until almost the end, and then it is vague and contained in sudden flashbacks with no explanation. (Sebold 55) (The Lovely Bones)In terms of the plot line the film attempts to get it, though it does not go into the depth that they do in the book. Jackson takes his time in carefully setting up the plot just enough so that we have a good urinate on the world of the story the entire time (USA). The time period is reflected well and the main character is likeable and someone who we can sympathize with easily, but not because she is a teenage girl that dies. Her temperament and narrations are what do it instead. The film moves back and forth between what the book and movie call the in-between or afterlife and the real world and comes across in the movie very visually (Visual). The visuals are just stunning and there is a unique feel about them as though you are in a dream while they play in front of you. The structuring of this movie is also kind of weird gratefully with so many other differences this didnt make the movie so confusing as to lose the audience completely (Filming).In film it diverts back and forth to Susie focusing on having her first kiss with Ray, the visually unrestrained in-between, and warning her family whereas the book, although narrated by Susie, explores so many other characters and life experiences. In contrast to the movie, the book is more of a coming of age story about a girl who will never get the circumstances to grow up. Susie can only grow ghostlikely by watching her family and friends as they each reach milestones, leave for college, get married and have kids of their own. For book readers shes already had her first ki ss and after watching her sister and Samuel make love she longs to do the same with Ray, the boy who was going to go out with her, her crush (Sebold 237). Susie later possesses Ruth, her former classmate and friend. Ruth, who has a spiritual connection with Susie, is overwhelmed by the feeling of her presence. Susie then enters Ruths body and makes love to Ray, which is over once again graphically described in text (Sebold 300). The movie focus again takes away from the book journey eliminating this sexual growth aspect to the teenage girl.Like many adaptations found with book to film projects you do lose a vast number of really all important(predicate) events. Such that, the scenes where we take in Harvey are well thought out in just how they show his life and his way of thinking in the film very vaguely. His apparent odd psychological state of mind, expressed with his need for an alarm to act him to open his window shades, does not translate as well in the movie (The Lovely B ones). His odd psychological state and inability to follow social norms are described in detail within the chapters as he devices ways to appear normal to the outside world (Sebold 130). In the book you get more in depth descriptions which develops the characters of not just Harvey and Susie but, her sister, her father and, especially, her mother. You learn a lot about her mother which is important however, in the film you learn very little.It is played out in the text that Abigail, Susies mother, never wanted children, withdraws from her family and has an affair with police detective Len Fenerman, the tec to Susies case (Sebold 196). You also dont learn in the movie that the mother dilapidated the father, sister and brother. You see her in the film leave with one old bag in a cab as though she is taking a vacation or just a getaway to clear her head. However, in the book narrations she abruptly leaves and takes a job at a vintner in California and attends College. Abigail leaves and creates a life for herself with her boyfriend, Samuel Heckler, who she becomes engaged to after refinement college. Only after hearing that Jack has had a heart fervency does she return eight years later (Sebold 220). This huge gap in time and events are not portrayed in the movie. The relationship between Abigail and her children is then laid out in detail as their son Buckley expresses bitterness for her abandoning the family for most of his childhood (Sebold 264). The filmmakers cut this out completely never even giving a hint that this fracture happened within the family. She is near ignored in the movie by giving us just small glimpses of an upset and lost mom, until Jack is nearly beaten to death and then appears again creating an image that she was there the whole time, perhaps outside in her lament (The Lovely Bones). This information could have made the film come to life as more realistic, instead it is projected on the screen that the family also lives in their ow n utopia of sorts.Both the book and film end with a similar event. Mr. Harvey, her rapist, her murderer, and the evil man that exists in the world is killed in the book when he is attempting to violate a young girl and an ice sickle falls from a tree expungeting his shoulder. As it hits him he is put off balance and falls into a duncical ravine. He lies there, being buried by the cold snow, not to be found for weeks (Sebold 327). It is similar in the movie he is also hit by an ice cycle and falls down a large ravine then abruptly ends. You have an idea that he is dead from the graphic fall, but still no closure, it is left(a) open ended. (New Zealand).When watching the movie you find that it seems to intertwine three story lines. First, is that of Susie in the in-between, the second deals with her mourning family and the third, interestingly, deals with her killer. Although this movie has a serial killer on the loose and its share of cops it is in no way like a crime or revenge s tory. Instead this is a movie about family bonds and about a loss. Its about the presence people can have in our lives even when they are gone its about understanding what closure really means, and differs from the novel.The Lovely Bones is a very compassionate story the way it is told from the girls point of view and the innocence that she has in the way she looks at the world she has left behind. Alice Sebold gives us a look at how the Salmon Family is forever changed as a result of Susies murder. Susie watches as her parents drift apart and her siblings and friends grow up and have experiences Susie can only witness. Through the experiences of the Salmon Family in The Lovely Bones, readers can examine their own feelings and reactions to loss and mourning. Susie is on this incredible chance into the world of the afterlife, described as the in-between. The rules of our world no longer apply. She has to come to terms with where she is and has to somehow influence events back down o n nation that enable her killer to be caught. It is an incredibly layered story getting its title from a section at the end of the book (Mehegan).These were the gentle bones that had grown around my absence the connections-sometimes tenuous, sometimes made at great cost, but often magnificent-that happened after I was gone. And I began to see things in a way that let me hold the world without me in it. The events my death brought were primarily that the bones of a body that would become whole at some unpredictable time in the future. The price of what I came to see as this miraculous lifeless body had been my life (Sebold 320). end-to-end this discussion you can see that as the book was translated to film, by director Peter Jackson, the differences that are often seen in book to film translations are more evident and clear as it goes along. Due to time constraints and interpretation, we find that a majority of book to film projects do not hold faithfulness to the authors. It has a lso been found that many books to film correlations create added characters or eliminate characters for theatrical benefit (Cohen 1). It may even be break to watch the film and then read the book. This might prevent you from making judgments about this film on the basis of the book such as, visual effects, timeline, and content, due to it being three hundred pages turned into two hours, which in text form are actually only about one hundred pages.Predictably, Peter Jacksons interpretation of The Lovely Bones is not personify to the interpretation of the author Alice Sebold. Clearly you can see that this story has been interpret in very different ways, both in film and in text. Differences within the movie create a watered down and non-confrontational approach to the real subject depend of the novel. Therefore, if you are looking to research any book by watching its movie remember you are belike going to be missing about two thirds of the book, if not more. As exampled here, wit h The Lovely Bones, the differences between book and film translations can be natural causing confusion and distorted reality of the content and subject matter of the authors original concepts.Work CitedBradshaw, Peter. Guardian. 2002. 14 Nov. 2012http//books.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/feb/18/the-lovely-bones-review.Cohen, Steven and Hark, Ina Rae. The Road Movie Book. Routledge. New York, NY. 1997.Filming the Lovely Bones (Special Features). DW Studios LLC. Dreamworks Pictures. BLU-RAY. 2009Garon, Jon. The Independent Filmmakers Law and handicraft Guide Financing, Shooting, and Distributing Independent and Digital Films. Chicago Review Press. Chicago, IL- 2nd Edition. 2009.Mehegan, David. Sebold, Alice. The Lovely Bones. Words to Live by (Supplementary interview). Little, chocolate-brown and Co. New York, NY. 2002.New Zealand pass Photography (Special Features). DW Studios LLC. Dreamworks Pictures. BLU-RAY. 2009Sebold, Alice. The Lovely Bones. Little, Brown and Co. New York, NY. 2002.Sebold, Alive. The Lovely Bones. The Oddity of Suburbia. (Supplementary essay). Little, Brown and Co. New York, NY. 2002.The Lovely Bones-Free Online Study Guide. The Best Notes. 2008. 14 Nov. 2012. http//thebestnotes.com/booknotes/lovely_bones_sebold.The Lovely Bones. Peter Jackson. DW Studios LLC. Dreamworks Pictures. BLU-RAY. 2009.USA Principal Photography (Special Features). DW Studios LLC. Dreamworks Pictures. BLU-RAY. 2009.Visual Effects (Special Features). DW Studios LLC. Dreamworks Pictures. BLU-RAY. 2009.York, April. Book vs. Film The Lovely Bones. 2010. 14 Nov. 2012.http//culturemagazine.ca/cinema/book_vs_film_the_lovely_bones.html.