Internationalization

Internationalization1. PrefaceThis authorship has been written for the course Societal Developments Institutions. The topic of this topic, familiarity sharing in realistic teams, is primarily concentrate on the Internationalization aspect of this course. But also aspects from former(a) courses of the Master of organisational Sciences (multiple sclerosis OS), like complexity inside Organizations and organizational propellents, are represented in this paper. practical(prenominal)(prenominal) teams and especially the knowledge sharing within such(prenominal) a team seemed very interesting to me. The broad link of this topic with the different courses of Msc OS was attractive to me, but also the growth in popularity of using this kind of the teams in at once business motivated me into doing this explore. I hope this inquiry about knowledge sharing in virtual(prenominal) teams can facilitate virtual teams in knowing the challenges ahead, and facilitate virtual team repugnrs and -designers in put on better from the advantages of virtual teams. Furthermore, after reading this paper I hope you, as reader, are (even more) exalt about the possibilities of working with virtual teams in the collaboration economy.Key concepts Internationalization, globalization, virtual teams, knowledge sharing.2. IntroductionIn todays society people have adopted media technologies, such as e-mail, chat, and videoconferencing, that enable them to go virtual and take with other individuals from all over the world. Currently, there are 1,733,993,741 internet droprs around the world (Internet world Stats, 2009). Because of those scientific innovations it is possible to collaborate with other people regardless there geographical position. The last couple of years, close to those technological developments, two other mechanisms developed in a historical bureau globalization and demography.Tapscott and Williams argued in their book Wikinomics (2006) The three mechanisms ap plied science, globalization and demography are influencing the world towards a new economy, the collaboration economy. rising globalization demands and facilitates new forms of economic collaboration and provides all businesses who are seeking for unique talents to fix their problems with sharp employees from over the tout ensemble world. And demographically there is also a shift. A new multiplication, bigger than the babyboom generation, the internet generation will dominate the 21ste century because of her demographical presence. This generation has grown up with internet and will utilize this applied science in an efficient way and will change the status-quo in a radical way. Doing business and the way of collaborating in business will also change. Old monolithic multinationals which creates added value in a unlikable hieratically structure is quickly outdated. Successful businesses nowadays need open and porous borders and should compete using knowledge, resources and cap acities alfresco the organization. Even heavy, capital intensive production industries will not be an exception.Also Ilinitch, DAveni Lewin (1996) dole outed those changes by opening their special issue on new organizational forms and hyper-competitive environments by nothing that, organizations are facing strong forces of change globalization, demographic shifts, advances in technology, and the demassification of society.In response to those changes and shifts organizational forms are proliferating. One such new organizational form is found in virtual teams, sometimes called distributed teams (Saunders Ahuja, 2006). Virtual teams are, in summary, technology mediated groups of people in various places around the world that work together on habitual tasks (Hardin, Fuller, and Davidson, 2007).Currently those virtual teams are widely embraced by modern businesses. A motive of this popularity is that they can help organizations adapt better. They may provide firms with advantages such as increased utilization of employee-time, round-the-clock workforce availability, and the fortune to leverage knowledge and expertise around the world (Paul, Seetharaman, Samarah Mykytyn, 2004). Virtual teams bring organizations also some other advantage reduced travel expenses, Co2 emissions, and less working time wasted on change of location (Lu, Watson-Manheim, House, Matzkevich, 2005). This increasing use of virtual teams is also noted by the Wall Street ledger. It reports that more than half(a) of companies with more than 5000 employees use virtual teams (de Lisser, 1999) Also, a survey by the Gartner group found that more than 60% of professional employees work in virtual teams (Kanawattanachai Yoo, 2002).The growth in popularity of virtual teams inquires a summary of how to manage such a team in an efficient an effective way. Questions about what are important factors in managing successful global virtual teams needed to be answered. In this inquiry I will do b y those success factors in case of knowledge sharing in global virtual teams by answer the question What are success factors of knowledge sharing in virtual teams, with team members across the whole globe?. This enquiry is focused on knowledge sharing in virtual teams because those dispersed teams in particular need to share knowledge, experience and insights in order to function successfully (Rosen, Furst, Blackburn, 2007). The aim of this paper is to facilitate virtual team managers and -designers with a summary of virtual team success factors in knowledge sharing by which they can benefit better from the advantages of virtual teams.Firstly I will address the theoretical background of virtual teams. In this theoretical background I will explain the organizational need for virtual teams, give a definition of virtual teams, deal with the key feature of virtual teams the absence of face-to-face contact and I will give an insight in the knowledge sharing mechanism. In the second par t of this paper I will focus on answering the research question based on earlier researches and literature references. This will be followed by a shortened conclusion and recommendations of those success factors in knowledge sharing to facilitate virtual team managers and -designers with a applicative summary.3. Literature ReferencesAllen, T., (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge (MA) MIT Press.Armstrong,D.L., Cole, P. (1995). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In Jackson, S. Runderman, M. (Eds) Diversity in Work Teams look into Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, p. 497-529.Bailey, D.E., Kurland, N.B., (2002). A review of telework research findings, new directions an lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 23, p. 383-400.Bell, B.S., Kozlowski, S.W.J., (2002). A typology of virtual teams Implications for effective leadership. Group Organization Management, 27, p. 14-49.Boutellier, R., Gassmann, O., Macho, H., Roux, M., (1998). Management of dispersed product development teams the eccentric of culture technologies. RD Management, 28(1), p. 13-25.Conrath, D., (1973). Communication environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Manage Science ,20, p. 586-603.Cummings, L.L., Bromiley, P., (1996). The organizational trust line of descent (OTI) Development and validation. Trust in organizations frontiers of theory and research. grounds Oaks, CA Sage Publications.de Lisser, E. (1999). Update on nonaged business Firms with virtual environments appeal to workers. Wall Street Journal, B2Devine, D.J., clayton, L.D., Philips, J.L., Dunford, B.B., Melner,S.B. (1999). Team in organizations Prevalence, charecteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group look, 30, p. 678-711.Duarte, D.L. Snyder, N.T. (2006). master Virtual Teams Strategies, Tools and Techniques That Succeed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Fiol, C.M., OConner, E.J. (2005). Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams Untangling the Contradictions. Organizational Science, vol. 16, p. 19-32.Gibson C.B., Cohen, S.G. (2003). Virtual teams that work Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Griffith, T.L., Neale, M.A. (2001). info processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams from nascent knowledge to transactive stock. explore in organizational behaviour, vol. 23, p. 379-421.Griffith, T.L., Sawyer, J.E., Neale, M.A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, p. 265-287.Gudykunst, W.B., (1997). Cultural variability in communication. Communication Research, 24, p. 327-348.Gullahorn, J., (1952). Distance and friendship as factors in the gross interaction matrix. Sociometry, 15, p. 123- 34.Hardin, A.M., Fuller, M.A., Davidson, R.M. (2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38, 130-155.Hertel, G., Geiser, S., Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams A review of current emperical research. gentleman Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.Hertel, G., Konradt, U., Lehman, K., (2004). Staffing virtual teams Development and validation of a web-based tool for selection and placement of virtual team members. Manuscript in preparation.Hollingshead, A.B., (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, p. 659-671.Ilinitch, A.Y., DAveni, R.A., Lewin A.y. (1996). New Organizational Forms and Strategies for managing in Hypercompetitive Environments. Organization Science, vol.7, p. 211-220.Internet World Stats (2009). pennant 20 countries with highest number of internet users. Retrieved November 25th, 2009 from http//www.internetworldstats.com/Jarvenpaa, S., Leidner, D., (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, p. 791-15.Jehn, K.A., (1995). A multimethode examination of the benefits and determents of intragroup conflict. Administrative science quarterly, 40, p. 256-282.Kristof, A.L., Brown, K.G., Sims, H.P.Jr., Smith, K.A. (1995). The virtual team A case study and inducive model. Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, 2, 229-253.Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M.,B., House, C.H., Matzkevich, T. (2005). Does distance matter? Bridging the discontinuities in distributed organizations. HICSS 2005.Levitt, B., March, J., (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual review of sociology, 14, p. 319-340Kanawattanachai P., Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. Journal of strategic Infromation Systems, 11, 187-213.Kaywoth, T., Leidner, D., (2000). The global virtual manager a prescription for success. European management journal, 18, p. 183-194.Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes , 52, 96-123.Konradt, U., Schmook, R., Mlecke, M., (2000). Impacts of telework on individuals, organizations and families a critical review. In C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (Ed), International Review of industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 15, p. 63-99, Wiley, Chichester.Kozlowski, S.W.J., Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work group and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124Lipnack, J., Stamps, J., (1997). Virtual teams. make across space, time and organizations with technology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Majchrzak, a., Rice, R., King, n., Malhotra, A., Ba, S., (2000). Computer-mediated inter-organizational knowledge-sharing insights from a virtual team innovating using a cooperative tool. Information Resource Management Journal, 13, p. 44-53.Martins, L.L., Gilson, L.L. Maynard M.T., (2004). Virtual Teams What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, vol. 30, p. 805-835.Maznevski, M., Chudoba, K., (2001). Bridging space over time global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organizational Science, 13, p. 473-492.McDonough E., Kahn, K., Barczak, G. (2001). An investigation of the use of global virtual, and collocated new product development teams. The journal of product innovation management, 18, p. 110-120.Monge, P., Kirste, K., (1980). Measuring proximity in human organization. Social psychology quarterly, 43, p. 110- 5.Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E., Kramer, R.M., (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in organizations frontiers of theory and research, Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications, p. 166-195.Owens, D., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., (1998). Strategic formation of groups Issues in task performance and team member selection. Research on managing groups and teams composition, 1, p. 1419-165.Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B., (2004). Virtual teams a review of current literature and directions for future research. The data base for advances in information sys tems, 35, p.6-36.Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., (2007). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NY Prentice Hall.Rosen, B., Furst, S., Blackburn, R., (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 36, p. 259-273.Sanders, C.S., Ahuja, M.K., (2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating Between Temporary And Ongoing Distributed Teams. Small Group Research, vol. 37, p.662-700.Sarker, S., Lau, F., and Sahay, S., (2001). Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. Database for advances in information systems, 32, 38-56.Scott, W.R. (1981). Organizations Rational, natural and open systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall.Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., (1986). Reducing social context cues electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage Science, 32, p.1492- 512.Stasser, G., Titus, W., (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making biased infor mation sampling during discussion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48, p. 1467-1478.Suchan, J., Hayzak, G., (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams a case study. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 44, p. 174-186.Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S.M. Hendrickson, A.R. (1998). Virtual teams Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Executive, vol. 12, p. 17-29Tapscott, D. Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin Group, New York.Thompson, L.L. (2004). devising the team A Guide for managers. New Jersey Pearson Education.Warkentin, M.E., Beranek, P.M., (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information system journal, vol. 9.Wegner, D.M., (1987). Transactive Memory A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of group behavior, New York Springer-Verlag.