Describe the concept of Moral Relativism Essay

You have no right to tell me what to do and What is true for you is not true for me are great examples of how we do not unendingly accept the real truth in life and these statements are both examples of relativism. There are four kinds of relativism metaphysical, epistemological, religious and moral which I am overtaking to talk slightly. Every alternative we make is due to each persons individual holiness.Morality is concerned with the free choice of rational kind beings, therefore Protagoras shows that there are no moral absolutes when he said Man is the measure of all things in addition moral relativism is the belief that morality does not relate to any absolute standards of right and wrong yet good and bad are dependent on culture and circumstance nitty-gritty that moral relativism is deontological because it all depends on something being right and wrong.Having a morality may mean that different groups of people may play different versions of football, expert like diffe rent countries have different legal systems, in addition having a certain moral could just be chosen by the biliousness that you are in at that certain time of day because moralities accepted at one time may fail to be accepted at another time. What is it for a group or an individual to have a fact morality? In some ways it is like having a particular language with a particular syntax (The arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language) and also how we use certain vocabulary.Your morality explains something about the way you act and about the way you react to the actions of others. In my opinion moral relativism is very contradictive and a good example of this would be law enforcement at bottom America because we and they say eat up is wrong and their solution is to murder the murderer via execution. We say theft is wrong and then take taxes from people without consent. If someone doesnt pay taxes and even resists then they will be judged as being morally wrong even though they are doing moral wrongness themselves. abject on, normative ethics is the main concept of moral relativism because it is the examination of issues of right and wrong and how people justify the decision they make when faced with situations of moral choice an example of this would be the ten commandments because they are a set of rules to stop us from being miss lead in life. In addition a great example of this would be when morality is determined by situations, for example, lying is wrong. But lying to the Nazis where the Jews are is right.Since situations are comparative and changing, then morality is relative and changing, however morality is not always determined by situations but conditioned by it for example murder is wrong, but one must murder someone for self-defence. So therefore this situation makes a deed right, Killing for self-defence makes killing not murder. Therefore killing for self-defence is not wrong. some other point people think i s true is that good intentions is enough. It is not. Hitler had good intentions, but his actions were not. A good intention can make a deed good, but a good intention does not make a bad deed good.